Sources & citations
OEIS, Wolfram-style proofs, and open academic journals feed our checks. We cite the relevant dataset in prose.
Editorial standards
How we publish trustworthy math content
Automation handles the heavy lifting, but humans remain accountable. The framework below guides every refresh cycle.
Review framework
Math validation: deterministic scripts verify factors, sequences, and numeral conversions against authoritative datasets.
Language clarity: editors rewrite autogenerated text to remove ambiguity and cite the underlying computation.
Compliance audit: each release runs through accessibility, structured data, and Helpful Content spot checks.
Back-testing: we monitor sample SERPs, feedback forms, and uptime monitors to ensure stable experiences.
Conflict of interest
Editors disclose partnerships. Commercial content is labeled and separated from educational resources.
Corrections policy
Send fixes to editorial@numberpedia.app. We patch within 72 hours and annotate major updates in the changelog.
AI usage
LLMs assist with tone but cannot publish directly. Every paragraph receives human review before shipping.
Update cadence
NumberPedia ships a quarterly quality review plus weekly micro releases. We prioritize pages with freshness-sensitive intent (current year, pop culture numbers) and high-traffic primes to keep searchers satisfied.
Quarterly
Full QA sweep
Weekly
Structured data & copy edits
Realtime
Bug + typo fixes via GitHub